<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trident must be part of the Strategic Defence Review, argues Des Browne</title>
	<atom:link href="http://labour-uncut.co.uk/2010/07/26/trident-must-be-part-of-the-strategic-defence-review-argues-des-browne/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://labour-uncut.co.uk/2010/07/26/trident-must-be-part-of-the-strategic-defence-review-argues-des-browne/</link>
	<description>Inside Labour Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 15:26:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coalition needs to work out where it stands on Trident &#124; Left Foot Forward</title>
		<link>http://labour-uncut.co.uk/2010/07/26/trident-must-be-part-of-the-strategic-defence-review-argues-des-browne/comment-page-1/#comment-4294</link>
		<dc:creator>Coalition needs to work out where it stands on Trident &#124; Left Foot Forward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 14:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://labour-uncut.co.uk/?p=2012#comment-4294</guid>
		<description>[...] position that Trident should not be considered in this autumn’s strategic defence review – as called for last week by former defence secretary Des Browne – and yet Osborne’s decision effectively [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] position that Trident should not be considered in this autumn’s strategic defence review – as called for last week by former defence secretary Des Browne – and yet Osborne’s decision effectively [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Stafford</title>
		<link>http://labour-uncut.co.uk/2010/07/26/trident-must-be-part-of-the-strategic-defence-review-argues-des-browne/comment-page-1/#comment-4218</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Stafford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 08:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://labour-uncut.co.uk/?p=2012#comment-4218</guid>
		<description>There is no appetite among the public for replacing Trident nuclear weapons.  Opinion polls consistently show that a big majority do not think Trident should be replaced.  This is no surprise when big cuts in public spending are on the agenda - who wants to spend billions of pounds on new nuclear weapons when your schools, hospitals, and local services are facing the chop?

The cheerleaders for replacing Trident are a rapidly shrinking fringe on the political right who are living in the past and who haven&#039;t realised that the days when Britian had an empire are long gone.  It&#039;s all the more astonishing that all but one of the contenders for the Labour leadership support Trident replacement.  Further proof that we are totally out of touch with the public on this, as with many other issues, and unless we change our tune rapidly we will be doomed to lose the next election as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no appetite among the public for replacing Trident nuclear weapons.  Opinion polls consistently show that a big majority do not think Trident should be replaced.  This is no surprise when big cuts in public spending are on the agenda &#8211; who wants to spend billions of pounds on new nuclear weapons when your schools, hospitals, and local services are facing the chop?</p>
<p>The cheerleaders for replacing Trident are a rapidly shrinking fringe on the political right who are living in the past and who haven&#8217;t realised that the days when Britian had an empire are long gone.  It&#8217;s all the more astonishing that all but one of the contenders for the Labour leadership support Trident replacement.  Further proof that we are totally out of touch with the public on this, as with many other issues, and unless we change our tune rapidly we will be doomed to lose the next election as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward Carlsson Browne</title>
		<link>http://labour-uncut.co.uk/2010/07/26/trident-must-be-part-of-the-strategic-defence-review-argues-des-browne/comment-page-1/#comment-4007</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward Carlsson Browne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://labour-uncut.co.uk/?p=2012#comment-4007</guid>
		<description>Why exactly is Mr McTernan allowing this &lt;a href=&quot;http://labour-uncut.co.uk/2010/07/16/its-time-to-stir-up-the-policy-debate-says-guest-editor-john-mcternan/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;shameless pandering&lt;/a&gt;?

It&#039;s actually sensible and well-argued. What&#039;s it doing on Uncut during his guest editorship?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why exactly is Mr McTernan allowing this <a href="http://labour-uncut.co.uk/2010/07/16/its-time-to-stir-up-the-policy-debate-says-guest-editor-john-mcternan/" rel="nofollow">shameless pandering</a>?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s actually sensible and well-argued. What&#8217;s it doing on Uncut during his guest editorship?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Trident must be part of the Strategic Defence Review, argues Des Browne « Labour Uncut -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://labour-uncut.co.uk/2010/07/26/trident-must-be-part-of-the-strategic-defence-review-argues-des-browne/comment-page-1/#comment-4003</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Trident must be part of the Strategic Defence Review, argues Des Browne « Labour Uncut -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://labour-uncut.co.uk/?p=2012#comment-4003</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by CND and Ben Soffa, Labour Uncut. Labour Uncut said: EXCLUSIVE: Trident must be part of the Strategic Defence Review, argues Des Browne http://bit.ly/dn11zU [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by CND and Ben Soffa, Labour Uncut. Labour Uncut said: EXCLUSIVE: Trident must be part of the Strategic Defence Review, argues Des Browne <a href="http://bit.ly/dn11zU" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/dn11zU</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Former Labour defence minister: We should review Trident &#124; Liberal Conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://labour-uncut.co.uk/2010/07/26/trident-must-be-part-of-the-strategic-defence-review-argues-des-browne/comment-page-1/#comment-3999</link>
		<dc:creator>Former Labour defence minister: We should review Trident &#124; Liberal Conspiracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 15:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://labour-uncut.co.uk/?p=2012#comment-3999</guid>
		<description>[...] an article for the new blog Labour Uncut, he says &#8220;the world has changed since we made our original renewal decision&#8221; in 2007. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an article for the new blog Labour Uncut, he says &#8220;the world has changed since we made our original renewal decision&#8221; in 2007. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

