Can Ed find prime ministerial credibility in selling the case for Europe?

by Kevin Meagher

Making a new case for an old ideal. In a nutshell that’s the job of all Labour leaders down the years. But Ed Miliband also thinks it’s the challenge for those who still see Europe as the solution to our national problems rather than the cause of them.

In his speech to the CBI yesterday he warned that fellow EU countries are “deeply concerned” because they sense Britain is “heading to the departure lounge”. A febrile mood on the Tory backbenches reflects the latent hostility among the British public with latest polls showing 56 per cent of Brits would vote to pull out if a referendum is held on the issue.

To his credit Ed stood firm against these siren calls saying he would not let Britain “sleepwalk toward exit from the European Union”. This is as strong an assertion of the importance of the EU as we have heard from any frontline political leader for some time. But even he only managed faint praise.

For he too recognises the EU’s focus is on the past not the future. It is still committed to propping up an insular, agriculturalist ancien regime rather than equipping Europe with the ability to withstand the challenges of the new century.

As he pointed out, farming subsidies still eat up 40 per cent of the EU budget while contributing just 1.5 per cent to economic output.  The focus should instead be on “public goods” for the EU economy like infrastructure, innovation and energy.

In a prescient section of his speech, he conceded that for the post-war generation, including his Jewish parents, “Europe was a murderous continent”. For them European unity was “a noble ideal” with the countries of Europe “seeking to put peace and prosperity in place of war and destruction through economic and political co-operation” (or in former SDLP Leader John Hume’s phrase, the EU is “the longest running peace process in the world”).

But in Ed’s view, the passing of this generation means “the power of the founding ideal has faded with it.” The challenge, once again, is to sell Europe to the ever-sceptical British public. In making that case the CBI isn’t a bad place to start. Business leaders instinctively see the upsides of Europe, principally the single market and whatever their personal views, greet talk of departure and the uncertainty it brings with dread.

But the underlying problem is that the pro-European case has never been put with a tenth of the verve, chutzpah or energy of the naysayers. There have always been those willing to act as a bulwark against the Euro-haters on the right, but they seem less evident that ever these days. (It says everything that one of the most prominent of their number was Denis MacShane).

So great are the failings of the pro-Europeans in British politics that the very continuation of UK membership of the EU is still openly discussed, with talk of an in/out referendum simply the Trojan horse for leaving. Miliband used the speech to rule out support for such a plebiscite:

“Think about a business considering coming to Britain. What would they think if there was a referendum now? They would put investment in Britain on hold as they waited to see. There would be instability in our economy.”

To be sure, he is on flimsier ground when he claims such a vote does not “reflect the priorities of the British people”. Just 28 per cent of voters think the EU is a “good thing” these days, while 45 per cent think it is a “bad thing”.

Europe unquestionably remains a concern of the cognoscenti, but perhaps that is no bad thing for Ed Miliband. While it is true that there are no votes in Europe, this may nevertheless be an issue where he can improve his prime ministerial standing.

Yesterday’s poll which showed that just 25 per cent of voters named him as the best potential premier is unchanged since January 2011. Cameron still outstrips him in on this measure with 33 per cent.

But as CBI Director-General John Cridland put it: “Business welcomes the emphasis Ed Miliband put on Europe – the issue of the coming months. The CBI is a euro-pragmatist, Britain must be part of the single market in a reformed Europe.”

There is no obvious downside, therefore, to making common cause with Britain’s captains of industry on the need for a strong but constructive voice in Europe, especially if it enhances his standing and credibility with them in the process. Yes, the founding ideal may have faded, but in owning the centre-ground on Europe Ed Miliband’s odds on entering Downing street can only improve.

Kevin Meagher is associate editor of Labour Uncut


Tags: , , , ,


4 Responses to “Can Ed find prime ministerial credibility in selling the case for Europe?”

  1. davidc says:

    “the longest running peace process in the world”

    yes, lets airbrush nato which includes the usa and canada but not , for an extended period, the french after they had a hissy fit and took their nukes away for a sulk, out of the picture

    all the eu did and does is operate as a very well paid gravy train for ‘ westminster rejects and whitehall retreads’

  2. Ex-Labour says:

    As with patriotism the “peace keeping” arguement is the last bastion of Europhile scoundrels. It harks back to the past and in my view has no part in the future. The public has, quite rightly, realised that the EU is now all encompassing and we are subserviant to the faceless unelected cabal within Europe. Just look at the perverse decisions coming from the ECHR yet again.

    Should we leave ? Maybe not, but a repatriation of powers – most of which were given away by Labour – is now called for. Millibands sudden hardening on the EU is opportunistic and will no doubt change if Labour is elected and as soon as the first Eurostar leaves St. Pancras after the election.

    The argument is made that it will hurt us if we leave the EU, but the EU sells 50 Billion more into the UK than we export to the EU. Will BMW stop selling its cars ? Will the French not export their wine ? Absolutely not.

    There is a big wide world out there with the BRIC’s nations booming but the EU restrict what we can do with them in terms of trade. I’m sure the CBI would welcome much looser political ties (and interference) but welcome shared trading links.

    I as an ex -Labour supporter could not see the Red – Eds in charge of the UK and I suspect when the public come to put pen to paper in a couple of years neither will they. Whatever you say about the abilities of Cameron he comes across much better that Millibands nerdy schoolboy impression.

  3. BenM says:

    @Ex_Labour

    “a repatriation of powers – most of which were given away by Labour – is now called for.”

    How mendacious.

    Leaving aside entry to the community itself (Heath), most powers were ceded by the Single European Act (Thatcher) and Maastricht (Major).

    Both signed by Tory Premiers.

  4. Amber Star says:

    For he too recognises the EU’s focus is on the past not the future. It is still committed to propping up an insular, agriculturalist ancien regime rather than equipping Europe with the ability to withstand the challenges of the new century.
    —————–
    I’d like to not starve to death. I think the CAP is worth it, just for that.

Leave a Reply