by Atul Hatwal
The worst day in government is better than the best in opposition, or so the aphorism goes.
It’s true.
As Aussie cricketers (who know a thing or two about winning) say, you’ve got to back yourself otherwise what’s the point in playing the game?
But if Labour does find itself in a position to shape the next government, it needs to do so in the right way.
It needs to be clear-eyed about its priorities.
First and foremost, should be stopping the Tories implementing their plans.
If David Cameron remains prime minister and delivers on even one tenth of his barmy promises for spending cuts and unfunded tax cuts he will undo much of the generational improvement to public services achieved by the last Labour government.
Second, should be to form a stable, enduring government.
There is a difference between the two priorities and the first takes precedence over the second.
Nothing would be a greater guarantor of years of opposition than a brief, calamitous interlude in government. A short-lived, fractious Labour administration that falls would ultimately deliver a full-blooded Conservative government with all of the damage that entails.
If Labour has a path to government tomorrow, Ed Miliband needs to test whether he can construct an enduring government. If not, he’ll need to make a difficult choice.
In a scenario where the parliamentary arithmetic means Labour could form a government, the first call Ed Miliband makes should be to the leader of the Lib Dems, even if that’s Nick Clegg. It means setting aside partisan rancour in favour of forging a stable coalition.