Posts Tagged ‘Assisted dying’

Labour’s three recent, unforced errors are far more serious than the Budget furore

08/12/2025, 08:46:35 PM

by Rob Marchant

While Westminster has been alight with chatter over whether or not Rachel Reeves misrepresented the facts in the run-up to her Budget, events have been happening in parallel which are likely to have a far longer shadow for Keir Starmer and his crew. Indeed, they are situations which, if left as they are, will continue to have brutal repercussions long after they all leave office.

The first was Wes Streeting’s announcement last month of the puberty blockers trial, due to kick off in the New Year.

When the Cass report landed in April last year, campaigners looking to protect Britain’s children from the harm of untested medicines were surely so overjoyed to see that thousands of lives could be protected from likely sterilisation and severe health problems in later life, that less focus was given to one of the report’s other recommendations, on the smaller number children which it recommended be recruited for a clinical trial, to finally put a stop to any debate on the efficacy of said treatment.

It seemed churlish to complain about this matter of the fine print, when the main battle, over ceasing the general puberty-blocker programme, had already been won. But now the last grain of sand has fallen into the bottom of the egg timer and the trial, which it was easy to blithely assume would never start, is about to begin.

This means that 226 children will be legally taking the same drugs which have been declared illegal for thousands of others diagnosed with gender dysphoria. To recap: these drugs have never been approved for this use; the treatment is experimental, with some horrific side effects; and consent cannot be meaningfully given by minors as young as 10, most of whom are too young to have experienced pubertal changes, let alone sex.

(more…)

Facebook Twitter Digg Delicious StumbleUpon

The assisted suicide Bill is an ethical Rubicon. Let’s not cross it

29/11/2024, 09:18:22 AM

by Kevin Meagher

Tellingly, the House of Commons website carries a warning about the research briefing on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, due to receive its Second Reading in the House of Commons today.

‘This briefing discusses issues around suicide which some readers may find distressing,’ it intones in bold writing. It’s grim subject matter to be sure, but there is still a need for candour. We are talking about ending human life, courtesy of the state’s healthcare professionals. What could be more distressing?

The proposed legislation would ensure that two doctors assess each request for an assisted death, ensuring the candidate had a ‘clear, settled and informed wish to end their own life’ and that they have reached this decision voluntarily, without pressure. If both doctors agree, the person may apply to the High Court for approval.

Kim Leadbeater the Labour backbencher promoting the Bill, is merely the latest campaigner seeking to alter the law in this area, following previous failed attempts by former Lord Chancellor Lord Falconer, in 2014 and former Labour MP, Rob Marris, in 2015.

Nothing about this issue is new.

‘Assisted dying’ – euthanasia in old money – remains an ethical Rubicon for our society, and one with ramifications beyond whether we allow a small number of patients in extremis and bound to expire the option of doing so earlier than nature intended.

For once we redefine the relationship between physician and patient in such a profound way, the door is opened to deeper questions and wider applications.

(more…)

Facebook Twitter Digg Delicious StumbleUpon