by Atul Hatwal
On one point, Douglas Carswell is right: the big result last night wasn’t Clacton, but Heywood and Middleton.
Shell-shocked Labour spokespeople have been on the airwaves giving the official line: the vote held up, no complacency, blah, blah, blah.
What they are saying doesn’t matter. They can’t tell the truth because the truth is toxic for the party. There are three reasons Heywood and Middleton happened: immigration, the economy and Ed Miliband’s leadership.
On each of the three, Labour needs to make a hard choice, if it is to avoid an almighty crash next May.
1. Immigration
Every canvasser who went to Heywood and Middleton came back with the same doorstep story: the voters wanted to talk about immigration. But Labour ploughed on with its line on the NHS. Disastrous.
Now, Labour will have to face up to having the difficult conversation on immigration, and it can go one of two ways: it can either tack right towards Ukip or it can make a case for its actual policy.
The former is the seductive option. It means that on the doorstep, canvassers can agree with voters. There’s no need for any tricky disagreement. All Labour representatives need do is to nod sympathetically, promise to be tough and hey presto, all is solved.
Except of course, it isn’t.