Cameron praised for Libya action

They talked glowingly of Mr Cameron’s “breathtaking courage,” and his “superb leadership.” Even those who admitted they had doubted the Prime Minister were forced to admit he had brought off a “remarkable diplomatic success”. In the eyes of some, Mr Cameron has come a long way in fewer than three weeks – from naïve novice to bold statesman. The Prime Minister took a few days to consider his options on his return from a trip to the Middle East late last month, but soon backed President Nicolas Sarkozy’s early call for a no-fly zone in Libya. He probably wished he had not as the call was waved away by serious international politicians. Mr Cameron was mocked for speaking out with no less a figure than Robert Gates, the United States defence secretary, condemning the “loose talk”. But as he travels to Paris this morning for a meeting of the European Union and Arab League, the Prime Minister has a right to feel vindicated. In No 10 there is barely-concealed delight at how the cards fell his way in spectacular fashion. – the Telegraph

If it wasn’t David Cameron‘s finest hour, it will be a miracle if he ever gets a finer. Since when did any prime minister stand up in the house and find himself sloshed with praise from every side? Even the sceptics were turned into true believers, for the moment. Tories who have been grumbling about the government’s failures were lined up to salute. The declaration of military action is by now a rite of passage for prime ministers. The prime minister must look grim, yet determined on victory. Next to him on the bench must be his closest allies – in this case Nick Clegg and William Hague – who must appear sorrowful, fearful, but equally determined. (Clegg looked particularly distraught, as if his dog had just died in an accident that also wrecked his car.) There has to be a collection of resonant phrases, Churchillian in tone. Margaret Thatcher, defending the right of the Falkland islanders to live under the crown: “That will be our hope and endeavour, and, I believe, the resolve of every member of this house.” Tony Blair sending the troops into Iraq: “Never let it be said that Britain faltered.” – the Guardian

Conservative ministers failing to deliver

Remarkable anecdote in James Forsyth’sSpectator column this week: One Secretary of State is so fed up with his department’s refusal to answer his questions that he has asked a friend of his, an MP, to put in a Freedom of Information request. The article provides an interesting assessment, suggesting that a mood close to panic is gripping the Conservative wing of the Coalition because of the difficulty of delivery. According to Forsyth, this has dangerously raised expectations of George Osborne’s ability to regain the initiative with the Budget. – John Rentoul, the Independent

Nick Clegg is Osborne’s human shield

Nick Clegg has soaked up the hatred that Osborne had expected to face: “He had predicted before the election he would be Britain’s most unpopular man within six months, but Osborne has cannily managed to avoid that fate… When asked why his prophecy about becoming Britain’s public enemy number one has not yet materialised, Osborne jokes with colleagues: “I hadn’t reckoned on Nick Clegg.” While Clegg was burned in effigy in Whitehall at the student protests last year, Osborne has yet to become a public target for eggs or worse.” – Conservative Home

The power of the civil service

This month, PR Week magazine learnt of a remarkable letter from Sir Gus to David Cameron, protesting that a Tory spin doctor working for the Communities Secretary Eric Pickles had launched a personal attack on a public servant, Jenny Watson, who now heads the Electoral Commission. That attack, Sir Gus wrote, was “unacceptable” and “will not be tolerated”. When David Cameron made a speech in Cardiff suggesting some civil servants were “enemies of enterprise”, the Financial Times reported that at the next meeting of senior civil servants, Sir Gus demanded an explanation from the senior civil servant in No 10, Jeremy Heywood. The Prime Minister is taking a foolish risk if he thinks he can do without the goodwill of the man who, because his initials are GO’D – and for other reasons – is known around Whitehall as GOD. It was O’Donnell whose steady hand made the transition to the first coalition government since 1945 so apparently simple and painless. And as the government presides over a fairly brutal regime of cutbacks, while potentially getting embroiled in a civil war in Libya, it will be O’Donnell who ensures that civil servants stick to the task of carrying out the will of the elected government regardless of their private opinions. – the Independent

UN votes for no fly zone

No more fear, no more hesitation. The moment of truth has come. That address by Colonel Gaddafi to the people of Benghazi finally prevailed on the UN security council. A body bedevilled by fear and hesitation faced its own moment of truth last night and voted for military action against Gaddafi’s troops. The resolution could, in the circumstances, not have been stronger. Whereas the magic words “all necessary means” were missing from the Resolution 1441 that Tony Blair tried, and failed, to interpret as a legal mandate for war, this authorisation sanctioned “all necessary measures”, barring ground invasion,  to protect the people of Libya. Doubters said that, if the UN ever acted, it would be too little and too late. Perhaps it will be. Huge problems lie ahead not only in helping those under siege in Benghazi but in using the levers the world has seized. It is not yet clear whether civilian protection is the only objective or whether the coming operation will not stop short of the removal of Gaddafi from power. If so, then who will take his place? – the Telegraph

RAF ground attack aircraft are ready to help impose a no-fly zone overLibya as ministers ordered defence chiefs to finalise plans enabling Britain to take part immediately in military action against forces loyal to Colonel Gaddafi. Tornado all-weather attack aircraft, equipped with precision weapons, were almost certain to be the first British assets used in any military operation, officials said. They are based at RAF Lossiemouth in Scotland and RAF Marham in Norfolk. Though due to phased out under the government’s defence their performance has been tested in operations over decades. It was not immediately clear whether they would fly from a military base in southern France or from RAF Akrotiri, in one of Britain’s sovereign base areas in Cyprus. It was also unclear whether Eurofighter Typhoons would take part in an operation. Britain has two ships off the Libyan coast, and Chinook helicopters and early-warning aircraft equipped with long-range radar based in Malta, but would need permission from the Maltese government to use them in action over Libya. – the Guardian

Darling warns Osborne on economy

Mr Darling’s thoughts now on the economy and the banking system, which we report today, deserve a wide audience. Mr Darling knows the Treasury from the inside. So his view that officials there will be working on a “Plan B”, to be used in the event that the economy crashes because of the Chancellor’s ambitious deficit reduction strategy, is significant. It raises an important question: will Mr Osborne quash Treasury suggestions of an alternative fiscal course for his own political reasons? Mr Darling’s argument that the banking sector has not fully learned the lessons from the financial crisis – and that banks are still over-reliant on wholesale funding – is also accurate. This is intimately connected to the question of the sustainability of the national finances because it is doubtful whether the state could afford another banking crisis. The Coalition will doubtless dismiss Mr Darling’s intervention as the usual partisan Labour critique of its economic policy. But that would be a mistake. Mr Darling has been proven right. – the Independent

70% favour slower cuts

British voters fear the Governments cuts are coming too fast to protect public services, but just under half blame the former Labour Government, a poll for Ipsos Mori has shown. The survey showed that 70% of people would favour cutting more slowly to reduce the impact on beleaguered public services. Just 28% of respondents said the Government had found the right balance between increasing taxes and reducing spending. Polling also revealed that Ed Miliband is the least popular party leader, with an approval rating of 36% against David Cameron’s 47% and Nick Clegg’s 40%. – Politics Home

Clegg defiant on AV role

Nick Clegg will defy calls for him to “lie low” in the referendum for voting system reform when he speaks at the launch of the Liberal Democrats’ “Yes To AV” campaign. Mr Clegg will insist the issue is not about party politics, and will set out his determination to argue the case for a change to the alternative vote (AV) “with passion”. Changing to a form of proportional representation for parliamentary elections has been a cornerstone Liberal Democrat demand for decades. A vote on AV – which is not a proportional system – was a compromise they secured in coalition negotiations with the Tories. The “Yes” campaign puts Mr Clegg into battle against Prime Minister David Cameron, who, along with most of his MPs, opposes the change. – Sky

Universities hit by cuts

English universities face a funding cut of 12% before the arrangements for tuition fees are changed. The chief executive of funding body Hefce, Sir Alan Langlands, described the reduction in spending as a “challenging settlement”. The cut includes an average 4% decrease in ‘recurrent grants’ for teaching and research, as well as capital spending cuts. Funding could also be hit by new visa restrictions on foreign students coming to study here.  The House of Commons Home Affairs Committee warns that raising the required standard of English for students could “cripple” the university sector. Universities Minister David Willetts said new funding arrangement would support “a more diverse sector” in which “the choices of informed students provide a drive towards high quality teaching and efficient use of resources”. The 1994 Group, which includes 19 of the UK’s leading research intensive universities, said the cut to capital funding poses a long-term threat to institutions. – Politics Home

Opposition to health reform grows

Hospitals will shut, others will lose their accident and emergency or maternity units, and some will be downgraded to glorified health centres because of the government’s NHS shakeup, the head of England’s leading hospitals has warned.  Sue Slipman, chief executive of the Foundation Trust Network, told the Guardian that handing GPs control of £80bn of NHS funds, letting private healthcare firms provide treatment and giving patients more choice about where they are treated – key policies promoted by the health secretary,Andrew Lansley – would increase existing pressures on hospitals so much that some will not survive. “There will be some ‘shut’ signs; I suspect there will be some closures. There will be fewer A&E departments and in urban centres there may well be fewer maternity units,” said Slipman, who predicted unprecedented changes to hospitals over the next few years. Cities, especially London, will experience the greatest loss of hospital facilities, she believes, while local hospitals in rural areas are more likely to continue to offer a traditional wide range of medical services. – the Guardian (more…)

More opposition to Lansley as BMA vote against health reforms

GPs could more than double their income to £300,000 a year under health secretary Andrew Lansley‘s plans for the NHS, according to an analysis for the Guardian – sparking calls from top doctors for the government to reverse controversial policies that would appear to reward physicians who ration care. The revelation comes after the British Medical Association voted to scrap the “dangerous” health bill and demanded that Lansley rethink his radical pro-market changes to the NHS. GPs are central to the government’s programme, and by 2013 will have to band together into consortiums before being handed £80bn of NHS funds to commission care for their patients. At the heart of many doctors’ concerns lies the possibility that, under the reforms, GPs’ pay will be linked to rationing patient care; in essence, being rewarded for saving the taxpayer money. Doctors’ leaders warned that the public would view as “unethical” any move towards a GP’s assessment of a person’s medical need being coloured by a profit motive. – the Guardian

Doctors’ leaders yesterday stopped short of a vote of no confidence in Health Secretary Andrew Lansley but demanded that he halt his plans to reform the NHS and condemned his failure to act on their concerns. In what is turning out to be a torrid week for the Health Secretary, the British Medical Association (BMA) called on him to withdraw the Health and Social Care Bill, now going through Parliament, and warned that it would lead to the “fragmentation” and “privatisation” of the NHS. However, the BMA failed to back a vote of no confidence and stopped short of condemning its leadership for pursuing a policy of “critical engagement” with the Government rather than outright opposition to the Bill, after an appeal from the chairman, Hamish Meldrum, not to “tie our hands”. – the Independent (more…)