The Uncuts: 2021 Political Awards (Part III)

Political Bravery Award: The women who stood up for Gender Critical beliefs

2021 may well go down as the year that it became impossible to ignore the clash between the ongoing campaign for transgender people to be able to self-identify themselves as the opposite sex, and the women’s and children’s rights on which this campaign impinges.

It was also the year when the BBC finally realised Stonewall, at the centre of this campaign in the UK, was a political lobbyist rather than a neutral service provider. And so, it finally left its Stonewall Diversity Champions scheme only after a piece of brilliant radio journalisism by the BBC’s very own Stephen Nolan and David Thompson. It was the two Ulstermen’s ten-part series which methodically exposed the sharp practice that Stonewall had been pulling off for years, with hundreds of companies: assess them for “diversity”, and then sell their services to those same companies to fill the gaps identified. Conflict of interests? Us?

But perhaps most importantly, the “cancellation” of figures who challenge the Stonewall-driven conventional wisdom – that men should be able to get access to women’s spaces by dint of simply saying that they identify as one – continues apace. It continues even to the point of apparently being official Labour policy, much to the dismay of many of its members and voters. Partly for this reason – with a few noble exceptions – it has mostly fallen to non-politicians to take a political stand on this.

Now this year, as for the last several years, J K Rowling – in the face of a furious backlash from the entertainment and literary industries – has been in the news for periodic, uncompromising tweets and articles on women’s rights. To a large extent, she has acted as not just a British but a global figurehead for the many, many women who refuse to be told to pipe down on this issue.

Brave though Rowling undoubtedly is, she herself would surely be the first to call out her privileged position as a world-renowned author. At the same time, a number of other, less well-known names have been in the news, often paying the price for their refusal to deny scientific fact with their jobs and reputations.

Dr Kathleen Stock was forced to leave the University of Sussex, for stating that biological sex cannot be changed. After a legal battle, the feminist campaigner Julie Bindel got her apology over a scurrilous article in Pink News, a year and a half after the event. Maya Forstater has won the first part of her tribunal appeal against the Center for Global Development, but still cannot easily return to her previous career. Columnist Suzanne Moore decided to leave the Guardian after being subjected to an effective kangaroo court by her peers, and journalist Jo Bartosch has steadfastly continued to write uncomfortable pieces in defence of women-only spaces.

Finally, let us not forget our own Rosie Duffield MP: clearly loved by her fellow members of the Women’s PLP, who have re-elected her to lead them, she remains at odds with the party leadership, which clearly wishes she would just stop being so…difficult.

Meanwhile, many men in the public eye who have spoken out – Simon Callow, Matthew Parris, David Aaronovitch, Simon Fanshawe – seem not, oddly, to have suffered similarly from the same hounding; all of which makes it difficult to conclude that there is not some deep misogyny being exposed on one side of this debate. Men can express an opinion: women need to shut up, or be damned.

So, to all these “difficult” women, famous and not-so-famous, who refuse to sit down, refuse to give way and refuse to play nice, we dedicate this award.

And as Labourites, we should perhaps take a moment to note something important: that most of these women, and their supporters, naturally gravitate towards the political left. People who are rightly cross about this issue and whom we are now busy pushing away, thanks to our collective tin ear.

Post script: following his interview at party conference, where he accused gender-critical women of being “dinosaurs” and “hoarding rights”, Uncut had been considering a special, one-off Winning Friends And Influencing People Award for David Lammy, for promoting Labour so effectively with 51% of the voting population.

But, hey, it’s Christmas. So we will settle for simply congratulating him for sparking a whole new genre of campaigning ever since that fateful interview: inspiring dozens of activists up and down the country, to don lurid green costumes and carry out “dinosaur stunts” for women’s rights in his honour. And adorn their Twitter profiles with the cutest little dinosaur emojis. 🦖 It’s certainly some kind of achievement for Labour to be remarked on, if not one which will win us votes.


Tags: , , , , , , , ,



Warning: Use of undefined constant REQUEST_URI - assumed 'REQUEST_URI' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /nfs/c06/h07/mnt/183863/domains/labour-uncut.co.uk/html/wp-content/themes/labour_uncut/comments.php on line 20

10 Responses to “The Uncuts: 2021 Political Awards (Part III)”

  1. Tafia says:

    Most of the public supports JK Rowling’s position.

    A man who self-identifies as a woman is still a man and in certain circumstances (toilets, changing rooms, prisons, hospital wards etc etc etc) should be treated as a man.

  2. Brita says:

    As David Lammy has recently disowned St Jerome de Corbyn, a mere 2 years after that disastrous election defeat that we all saw a mile off, perhaps he will see the light… in about 2025. Because this is yet another issue that is playing right into Tory hands. Forget the white noise of sleaze, one rule for them, covid misteps etc by the time of the next election all the posters will be of “Labour and the Lib Dems will take away your daughter, wife and nan’s right to have a real lady doctor”

  3. David Cameron’s tribute to new labour was the country was more at ease with itself
    Starting to think if it’s at odds now
    Was if sue to him the country was more at ease with itself
    First The post war concensus was never as popular as suggested
    Certainly by 196: cracks had shown in discussed poverty council houses built shoddily
    The idea of the state investing in industry badly thought out
    Then the sea change of 1979
    The we took the medicine if worked approach of thatcher
    As do called divisive
    So if the country not at ease with itself
    It’s not just the social media of the Labour Party that in thd last 2 months has seen thd Tories poll lead go

    Fact was some very bitter Corbynites blamed the country for not voting labour and stuck their fingers in their ears when it was said maybe if was their own fault
    But then labour doesn’t want to win

    Fact Tories haven’t fallen between 33% labour can’t get more than 40% and reform are. On 6% and Scotland will see A Tory revival

  4. Ann Onnimus says:

    Because, obviously, siding with the governing Tory establishment, the Tory press barons, the extreme religious right and antisemitic conspiracy theorists to attack the rights of a vulnerable minority is the very essence of “bravery”. Christ almighty, can you people not hear yourselves?!

  5. Tafia says:

    Across December there were 27 polls conducted at various times by all the major polling agencies. Unusually, for outside of an election time, these included 5 MRP polls (MRP polls are conducted using a very different methodology). There was also an awful lot of ‘in depth’ stuff.

    Polling average was (figure in brackets compared to last month).

    Con 33.6% (-3.0%)
    Lab 38.3% (+1.8%)
    LDem 10.0% (+0.8%)
    Grn 6.1% (-0.5)
    Rfm 5.7%*
    Oth 6.3%*
    Lab lead over Con: 4.7% (+4.8%)
    (* Because of the rapid growth of Reform, they will now be shown separately to ‘Oth’ until they drop back to <2% again. Reform have grown rapidly, and in the last couple of weeks of December were averaging at north of 6% ).

    Tory support swung between 31-38%, the Labour's between 33-41% and the LDems between 8-13%, indicating a highly volatile electorate. Labour managed to hit the magic 40% six times during the 27 polls and on one occasion showed a 9% lead (Opinium, 8-10 Dec). The Tories led Labour in four of the polls – all early in the month. The remaining 23 were Labour leads of between 2-9%

    December hit the Tories hard and contrary to the perception it is the media's 'sleaze' stories doing the damage, underlying polling amongst actual wavering Tory voters shows that the main reasons for their discontent with Boris are illegal immigration, the triple lock, Covid fatigue (the standard Tory voter wants a total end to lockdowns, restrictions etc and just 'live with it'), and the perception that we are still too closely tied to the EU. 'Sleaze' is in 5th place as a cause amongst actual Tory waverers. That said, for a mid-term the Tory strategists will probably be quietly satisfied with things – at this stage under Miliband Labour were over 20 points ahead and under both Corbyn mid-terms were over 10 points ahead. The Tories won the three subsequent elections.

    Interestingly, despite this being a very very good month for Labour overall, they are still below where they were during the period Oct 20 – Jan 21 and their lead is more down to disaffected Tories moving to Lawrence Fox's Reform Party than the electorate as a whole looking at Labour as 'electable', making Labour’s lead fragile at best and making it look more of a traditional mid-term anti-government reaction as opposed to an election time pro-opposition endorsement. The biggest 'gripe' among non-tribal Labour voters by a very very long way remains the belief that they don't actually know what Labour stands for, nor what it would do differently if they were in power now. Nor are they convinced (despite Labour assurances) that Labour will not attempt to move to a position of 'closer alignment' with the EU, nor attempt to re-join the Customs Union or even the Single Market. Should they suddenly perceive Labour as intending to do any of that, Labour would suffer a major reversal in the polls quite quickly. The EU and attitude to illegal immigration remain Labour's weak points along with economic competence.

    As it stands, if a General Election were conducted on these figures and using the new boundaries, it would result in a hung Parliament of L289, C270, SNP55, LD15, PC2 G1, NI18, with neither side being able to form a majority government without the SNP – and the SNP remain adamant that the price of their support is the immediate and total devolution of the Section Order, and at that point, their MPs will adopt a position similar to Sinn Fein's and not take their seats. Anything less and they will not prop up either a red or a blue Westminster government. Remember, the SNP has absolutely no interest in Westminster – Red or Blue, and sees both Westminster and the two main parties as nothing more than albatrosses round it's neck and an imperialist construct and obstruction to Scotland's independence.

    As Prof Curtis points out – “The big difference now is that Starmer (still) isn’t seen as a leader-in-waiting. Indeed, that Labour performs so well in the polls (currently) is more due to Conservative collapse than resurgent Labour.” Likewise Justin Ibbett, Chief Executive of FocalData (leading MRP pollsters) “We are talking about a collapse in the Tory vote not a revival of the Labour party.”

    In-depth reveals that less than 2% of voters have switched directly from the Tories to Labour – the majority of Tory 'deserters' have gone further to the right to Reform (the new UKIP/Brexit Party) and will probably mostly return come election time, or have gone to the LDems (particularly in leafy suburbia). Most of Labour's surge seems to be coming from 'Don't Knows' and from LDems. This would explain why the LDems remain largely static despite hoovering-up Tory waverers – for every Tory they get, in turn they lose one of theirs to Labour. Anne McEvoy, of The Economist and writing in the Guardian this week sums it up very well in her article where she says "Tories do not fear Keir and until they have reason to do so, Labour’s paper gains and more positive polling will remain unconsolidated" ( tinyurl.com/ypkz5nj5 ).

    Comparison
    General Election 12 Dec 2019:
    UK TOTAL – Con 43.6%, Lab 32.2%, LDem 11.6%, Grn 2.7%, Oth 9.9%
    GB ONLY – Con 44.7%, Lab 33.0%, LDem 11.8%, Grn 2.8%, Oth 7.7%
    UK lead Con over Lab: 11.4%
    GB lead Con over Lab: 11.7%

    Polling figures for 2021 (256 polls)
    Con 40.3%, Lab 35.2%, LDem 8.4%, Grn 5.7%, Rfm 5.7, Oth 4.7
    (Oth includes SNP, Plaid, UKIP)
    ave lead Con over Lab 2021: 5.1%

    Polling figures for Dec (27 polls)
    Con 33.6%, Lab 38.3%, LDem 10.0%, Grn 6.1%, Rfm 5.7%, Oth 6.3%
    ave lead Lab over Con Dec: 4.7%

    **************************************************

    I mentioned that there had been 5 MRP polls during December – as many as the rest of the year combined. MRP polls are conducted using very different methodology to standard opinion polling and a description can be found at this link; ( tinyurl.com/2zxw9e77 )

    The 5 averaged:-

    Con 33.0%
    Lab 39.0%
    LDem 9.4%
    Grn 6.4%
    Rfm 4.8%
    Oth 7.4%

    This is broadly in line with the remaining 22 non-MRP standard polls, suggesting that the current average is about correct.

    **************************************************

    BREXIT

    There was also a Brexit-related Poll earlier in the month showing that the majority of people are now dissatisfied with Brexit however it was poorly conducted and failed to separate the "dissatisfied" into the two clearly different and opposing 'dissatisfied' camps – dissatisfied that we left, or dissatisfied that we haven't left far enough nor fast enough.

    Remainers such as Lord Adonis immediately jumped on it as proof as we should re-join when it is anything but – quite the opposite in fact when you look at the breakdown. 'Drill Down' in the figures shows that the overwhelming bulk of Leave voters who are now classed as "dissatisfied" don't support re-joining – rather they are actually dissatisfied because they don't think we have left far enough nor fast enough (remember, amongst Leavers, the clean-break No Deal was and still remains their favoured option) and believe we are still kow-towing to the EU too much and failing to put enough clear water between ourselves and them. The 'Drill Down' figures are very probably why the Lib Dems, the SNP and the Remain element of Parliamentary Labour didn't make any effort to run with it and the poll died a quiet and largely unremarked death within days, mourned only amongst the columnists of The Guardian. Even the BBC lost interest in it after a couple of days, Ch4 even faster.

    **************************************************

    SCOTLAND

    3 Westminster polls averaging:
    SNP: 48.0%, Con: 19.5%, Lab: 19.0%, LD: 6.0%, Oth: 4.0%
    (GE 2019 – SNP 45.0%, Con 25.1%, Lab 18.6%, LDem 9.5%, Oth 1.8%)

    2 IndyRef polls, averaging:-
    Yes: 48.0%, No: 43.5%, DK: 8.5%
    (Y:52 N:48)

    *******************************************

    WALES

    1 Westminster poll:-

    Lab: 41%, Con 26%, PC: 13%, LDem 3%, Grn 6%, Rfm 7%, Oth 4%
    (GE2019 – Lab 40.9%, Con 36.1%, PC 9.9%, LDem 6.0%, Grn 1.0%, BXP 5.4%, Oth 0.7%)

    *******************************************

    NORTHERN IRELAND

    There were no political opinion polls during the month, however there is a full slate Stormont election due on 05 May 22, so polling activity will increase markedly fairly soon.

    1 IndyRef poll:-
    Yes: 41, No: 49, DK: 10%
    (Y:46, N:54)
    (This is broadly in line with the sectarian split. Quelle surprise.)

    *******************************************

    REPUBLIC OF IRELAND

    I include the Republic because they are the only foreign country with a common land border with the UK and also share a common heritage. In addition, what goes on in Dublin also has an effect on Belfast & London.

    Their FG/FF/Grn Tri-Partite Coalition government is fragile at best – the Greens are deeply dissatisfied and already rumbling their discontent, whilst Sinn Fein – who feel sorely aggrieved at deliberately being excluded from the Coalition despite winning the same number of seats as FF and more than FG, are now leading in the polls by quite a margin, scent blood in a big way and are spoiling for a fight. As a result the Coalition will almost certainly not see out a full term without falling.

    It should also be remembered that both FF & FG are right of centre in political belief – particularly economically, whereas their Coalition junior member – the Greens, are decidedly left wing and share more in common with Sinn Fein and the Irish Labour Party.

    2 Polls during the month that averaged out as (comparison to last month in brackets):

    SF: 34.5% (+0.5)
    FF: 21.5% (+4.5)
    FG: 20% (-2.0)
    GP: 5% (n/c)
    LP: 4.5% (+0.5)
    SD: 2% (-2.0)
    S-PBP: 1.5% (-0.5)
    AÚ: 1.0% (-1.0)
    Oth: 10% (n/c)

    (General Election 2020)
    SF: 24.5%
    FF: 22.2%
    FG: 20.9%
    GP: 7.1%
    LP: 4.4%
    SD: 2.9%
    S-PBP: 2.6%
    AÚ: 1.9%
    Oth: 13.5%

    Dail Seats (160)
    SF: 37
    FF: 37
    FG: 35
    GP: 12
    LP: 6
    SD: 6
    S-PBP: 5
    AÚ: 1
    Ind/Min: 21)

    ****************************************

    FRANCE (elections 10 & 24 Apr, 2022)

    There are 17 candidates at this stage, however only the 5 I have listed below have any realistic chance of making it to the actual first ballot on 10 Apr, let alone the second round run-off.

    After the first round of voting on 10 Apr, all remaining candidates at that stage bar the top two are eliminated. The top two then progress to a run-off on 24 Apr, with the final winner then becoming President. This actually makes things far more interesting, especially this time. For example should Melanchon – a near-Communist and outspokenly anti-EU be eliminated in the first round, would his voters switch to pro-EU Macron in order to block someone from the right? Or go to the right to support someone anti-EU?

    All smart money is that second round run-off will now be between incumbent Macron on one side and either Le Pen or Pecresse on the other, and it will be the French voters feelings over the EU and their own illegal immigrant problems that will decide the winner. Pro-EU, or EU-lite, or No EU. Whatever, the final result looks as though it is going to be very very close, with Macron shading it slightly if up against Le Pen, but losing narrowly if up against Pecresse. Historically, the eventual winner of the second round wins more because people are voting against the other candidate as opposed to supporting the winner – 'clothes pegging' as it is referred to, where they wear a clothes peg on their nose and vote for the candidate who stinks the least.

    During December there were 16 Polls averaging:

    ( Top 5 – Left-Centre-Right-Nationalist-Gaullist)

    Melenchon: 9.8% (anti-EU)
    Macron: 24.0% (pro-EU)
    Pecresse: 17.1% (EU-sceptic)
    Le Pen: 15.9% (anti-EU)
    Zemmour: 13.4% (anti-EU)
    12 Others: 19.8%

  6. John PReid says:

    Tafias right to state in December there was a 4.3% Average labour lead that’s downn to 3% January and 6% Reform and december A libdems increase by 1%

    bascially blue wall Tories are protest voting libdem, and the tores are lsoign out to farages lot who’ll do a deal or see theri won supprters return to the Tories through fear of A labour gov’t

    i oculd see the tories level pegging if not on a increase by the end of the month getting even more red walls in other areas,even getting Scottish vote as the Scots thought why Did the SNp put us in lock down over new years Eve,.

  7. Why Doesn’t Jeremy Corbyn just F off and Join the Independent Islington Party!

  8. steve says:

    @ john P reid. I’m wondering why Starmer doesn’t jog on and join the ‘We Love the EU’ party.

  9. steve he’s already in it

  10. Whatever the polls at The end of the month
    Will show SNP down to less than 4% with then going to the 2 main parties and reform in 4% and the greens down a lot it shows labours increase is at thd expense of greens not a case of labour Tory switchers

Leave a Reply