Posts Tagged ‘Dan McCurry’

The nice party isn’t going to get into government

15/01/2012, 11:26:57 AM

by Dan McCurry

Ed Miliband has never attended the Cenotaph in his donkey jacket, nor has he screamed from a podium, “Yeeeaaaar alright”. But the difference is that those leaders existed at a time when Labour was ungovernable, or they made Labour governable, and it took everything out of them. Ed, on the other hand, was gifted a benign set of circumstances, but has led us into decline.

If there is a plot against him, then I’d hardly be the first to know. But if there is, it won’t happen until May. With the London elections such a knife edge business, no one wants to rock the boat. This means one of two things: either Ed has the chance of being the turnaround kid, or the Labour party (on the national stage) is in for a lame duck period.

Maybe it is too late for Ed Miliband. I’m not ruling out a bolt from the blue that will reignite his leadership, but I think luck tends to hang out with those who have chutzpah. And if Cameron can be admired for one thing only, he knows how to brazen it out.

(more…)

Facebook Twitter Digg Delicious StumbleUpon

Honour and shame in Tower Hamlets

17/12/2011, 12:30:55 PM

by Dan McCurry

We used to be proud of spreading our ideas around the world. Now we are confused about how we explain our identity to the people who have settled here.

The problem is that we need to understand their culture and identity, before we can explain to them our own. With 3,000 honour crime complaints to the police last year, maybe this is the issue that we’re failing to comprehend.

It would help to understand what happened in Tower Hamlets last year, when the Labour party collapsed in on itself over the selection of Lutfur Rahman as candidate for mayor.

It started out as a conversation about secularism. But we didn’t know it was about secularism, because in school we learn everything there is to know about Martin Luther King, but nothing about Martin Luther. We know about the rights of minorities, but not about the separation of church and state.

(more…)

Facebook Twitter Digg Delicious StumbleUpon

Riots: you need police officers for a police surge

21/08/2011, 11:02:26 AM

by Dan McCurry

Cameron’s contradictions continue to baffle. Crowing before a packed parliament for the riot recall, he hailed the police “surge” as if it was all his own idea. No wonder the police are furious, he wasn’t even in the country when they formed their strategy. Not only did he not invent the police surge, he doesn’t even understand it, judging by the contractions he made.

David Cameron is at his most passionate when making sweeping statements about the waste that comes from officers engaged in back-office tasks. It is true, that having a police officer responsible for neighbourhood watch is more expensive than hiring a civilian to do the task. But the civilian is unlikely to understand the role, as well as being unable to don a uniform, at a moment’s notice, to face down a riot. If you lose the officer, you lose the ability to surge.

As for the neighbourhood forums; are the police wasting their time, speaking to the public, when they should be out there nicking people? This is arguable, but the job of being a police officer is not simply to enforce the law, but also to reassure the public that there is a system in place protecting them.

When serious allegations of child abuse in a dysfunctional family emerge, it is normal practice for social workers to meet with police officers and the CPS in order to decide the best way forward. If the police are to be removed from this back-office task, can a civilian worker fulfil their role, and what would be the training and qualification for this civilian worker. If a former social worker was qualified, what’s the point of the meeting without the input of an experienced officer?

Would it be possible for the civilian worker to be trained in public order policing, in order that she can assist when a terrorist incident creates the need for a surge? If so then the savings made by employing a civilian worker, would be lost by the expense of having to provide extensive training.

There are situations where expensive police officers should not be deployed. Having one hundred officers slowly walk across a field in search of clues to a nearby murder, probably isn’t the best use of resources, when civilians could do the same task equally well. But to claim that officers are only doing their job if they are actively engaged in answering 999 calls, is failing to recognise the wide range of duties that they undertake.

A reserve list, and better incentives for specials, would help with wide fluctuations in ebb and flow. But the ability to rapidly take officers from office activities and deploy them quickly in the field would be seriously undermined by the determination to seriously reduce their overall numbers.

Mr Cameron believes that he can cut police numbers and guarantee future police surges. Many Labour MPs, and much of the British public, cannot reconcile these two opposing statements. The prime minister must rethink this short-sighted policy.

Dan McCurry is a Labour activist whose photographic and film blog is here.

Facebook Twitter Digg Delicious StumbleUpon

Arts: Dylan classic deconstructed

10/07/2011, 10:00:25 AM

What it means: Subterranean Homesick Blues

by Dan McCurry

“Johnny’s in the basement, mixing up the medicine. I’m on the pavement, thinking about the government“.

On the question of darkness and light, Dylan gives us darkness masquerading as light. This is a depiction of people in misery. His friend is mixing up the medicine, or heroine, while he thinks about the government. With those first two lines, almost in the same sentence, I see the writer using heroin to escape his problems, but blaming his addiction on society, on the government. He’s looking outside himself to find blame for his misery. He is saying, “it’s society that’s dysfunctional not me”.

The lyrics give us a vivid description of a complex condition, the disaffected: Those who feel that they do not fit in with our society and therefore engage in criminal behaviour, or escape into drug and alcohol addiction.

“Look out kid, it’s something you did. God knows when but you’re doing it again”.

This is a much more touching and sympathetic description of a young person who can’t seem to get it right. He can’t seem to get a grasp of the basic rules. And society just keeps hitting him with punishments without helping him to understand where he’s going wrong. Society is all powerful, but not a friend, not a guiding hand, just a purveyor of punishment.

“A man in a coon-skin cap, in a big pen, wants 11 dollar bills, you only got 10.”

Davy Crockett immediately springs to mind as a man in a coon-skin cap. The word “pen” is American slang for a jail. This imagery accuses America of fundamental injustice, with a picture of Davy Crocket as a prison governor demanding a get-out-of-jail fine, which is always just beyond our means.

The frontiersmen, such as Davy Crocket, are epic folk heroes in the minds of Americans. They are the ones who discovered the Appalachian passage which enabled America to expand from a 13 state colony of Great Britain into the 50 state superpower of the modern day. To describe the pioneers as creators of an unjust prison is an attack on the identity of America.

Dylan then describes his friend Maggie as having a face full of black soot.

“Maggie comes a fleet foot, face full of black soot”.

Heroin is consumed by chasing the dragon. By using a cigarette lighter to heat the heroine on a spoon, until a plume of black smoke emerges, and this is inhaled. The image of Maggie is the equivalent of an alcoholic who has spilt whisky down his shirt.

Many critics of this piece believe that LSD is being manufactured in the basement, but LSD was only made illegal in 1965, a year after this film was made.

Maggie is paranoid about a police raid, “They must bust in early may, orders of the DA”.

She also speaks about bugs planted in the basement and Dylan retorts, “The phone’s tapped anyway.”

“Keep away from those men around the fire-hose”, is a reference to the racist police who used fire hoses against civil rights demonstrators around this time. Again Dylan seeks negative depictions of representatives of the state.

Earlier he made reference to street life with the lines, “duck down the alleyway, looking for a new friend”. Now he describes the colourful characters of street life. “Look out kid, you’re gonna get hit, by users, cheaters, six times users, hanging by the theatres. The girl by the whirlpool is looking for a new fool”.

This is insightful, because the disaffected community, who make up street life, hang out together because they’ve got nowhere else to go. These are the ones who don’t fit in with normal society and have normal jobs. But nor are they very nice to each other. It is a world of mutual abuse. It demonstrates that he speaks from personal experience about this world, but the uplifting mood of the song demonstrates that he likes and fits in with this world.

“Twenty years of schooling and they put you on the day shift”, is again cynical. Education is one of the foundation-stones of our society, but he dismisses it by describing the whole system as a cheat, that the inevitable outcome is manual labour. Everything is someone else’s fault, and nothing is his own.

The picture that Bob Dylan paints for us is one of addiction and the addict is blaming everyone else, rather than looking within for a solution to his problems.

It is therefore little wonder that Bob Dylan was frustrated when people regarded him as a leader. The video above is from the 1964-shot documentary, Don’t Look Back. In this clip, the Time correspondent Horace Freeland Judson was offended by what he considered to be a contrived tirade of abuse from Dylan.

However, Dylan was responding to the description of himself as a leader of his generation. He was perfectly reasonable in his frustration of this analysis. He wasn’t putting himself forward as a leader and didn’t want to be on pedestal. His was a voice of disaffection, after a childhood as a serial runaway in Minnesota, who didn’t claim to have answers.

The recent disclosure of Bob Dylan’s heroin use coincides with his seventieth birthday. He attributes his addiction to the pressure he was under at the height of his fame. This suggests that he subsequently overcame drugs by looking within himself, rather than looking for someone else to blame. To me, this is a stark contrast to the lyrics of Subterranean Homesick Blues, a song of darkness masquerading as light, but brilliant none the less.

Dan McCurry is a Labour activist whose photographic and film blog is here.

Facebook Twitter Digg Delicious StumbleUpon

Libya is in danger of turning into a Carry On film

17/04/2011, 10:46:28 AM

by Dan McCurry

David Cameron and Nicolas Sarkozy have adopted their very own belligerent Arab city, along with several belligerent Arab towns. In total, the entire population of eastern Libya. Whether they like it or not, if they walk away from the situation now, they will be responsible for every act of the regime’s retribution, every arrest made and every life taken.

For Britain and France, to walk away now would be the equivalent of a parent who refuses their baby food, or a doctor refusing their patient treatment. When a politician starts a war, they are responsible for those on the ground who will suffer the consequences of the military action.

If this were a movie, the tragic-comic premise would be the central characters stuck in a situation of their own making. Unable to negotiate a truce between Tripoli and Benghazi, and unwilling to lose face, their only option is to carry on bombing. Perhaps Sid James would play Sarkozy and Hattie Jakes would play Cameron as Matron.

They are publicly angered with the Nato partners who have not been pulling their weight. It is not the provision of jets that is at the forefront of their concerns, but the laying off of responsibilities, the sharing of the burden and the consequent reduction of their own embarrassment.

Cameron and Sarkozy are telling everyone that, “we’re all in this together”, while desperately trying to play down who led the way in this inadvisable adventure. They want Italy to share the blame of a war gone wrong. (more…)

Facebook Twitter Digg Delicious StumbleUpon

Go Fast Dave.

05/04/2011, 05:00:24 PM

by Dan McCurry

Dave Cameron likes to move fast. He can take big risks because he’s cool in a crisis; it suits him. He will make his mark, even if it is a skid mark from his handbrake turns on policy.

He moves so fast that his election honeymoon lasted only a few weeks and the voters’ mid-term blues appeared in the polls within months. That’s fast. Very fast.

When his domestic policy began to fall apart, he did what all elected leaders do, and turned to foreign policy. So fast is Dave Cameron that this came about before his first year of office was even complete. It took two weeks for his Libya policy to fall apart. (more…)

Facebook Twitter Digg Delicious StumbleUpon

The Palestinians will not find peace through bloodshed

07/02/2011, 02:00:43 PM

by Dan McCurry

Malcolm X once told black Americans, “You didn’t land on Plymouth Rock; Plymouth Rock landed on you”.

Millions of people from the developing world have risked their lives to get to the West, while the Palestinians had the western world come to them, in the form of Israel. But where this should have been an opportunity, it was more like a great big rock landing on them. They were simply unable to cope.

The photo shows me, in 1986, with one foot in Israel and one foot in Egypt. My anxiety is due to the barbed wire getting caught on my T-shirt. Back then there was no border on the West Bank, never mind a wall. Palestinians were free to come and go across Israel. They worked, they travelled, they engaged in politics. There was violence, but there was also optimism. Then came the suicide bombers.

The word “solution” in the phrase “two-state solution” is misleading. It suggests that the problems will end if property and land rights are settled. It does not promise to create jobs or prosperity for the Palestinians, but it does promise to end any further justification for Palestinian violence.

It was a top-down policy, insisted on by the international community. It created trepidation in the West Bank, with graffiti appearing on walls calling for a one-state solution. The Palestinians want jobs, but the solution seems to promise a permanent partition, with a permanent separation wall. Washington’s policy was never born from reading the writing on the wall.

Wherever I went in Israel, in the 80s, the building sites were full of Arabs. I asked an Israeli if this was somehow racist. He told me that Israelis wanted to get into construction, but the Palestinians wouldn’t let them in. Today, construction workers are imported from Asia. Technology companies adopt restrictive employment policies for “security reasons”. The Israeli economy is being denied to the “ungrateful” Palestinians. (more…)

Facebook Twitter Digg Delicious StumbleUpon

No to AV – if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it

09/01/2011, 10:30:18 AM

by Dan McCurry

How ridiculous that the pro-AV campaign attacked the MPs who have pledged themselves against. That policy was in the manifesto for the benefit of the Lib Dems, who then shafted us, yet they claim that we’re committed to an obsolete manifesto that has already lost us the election.

Just as silly is their argument that AV would not be good for the Lib Dems. I wish they’d tell the Lib Dems that, because this was the crucial offer from the Conservatives that made the coalition happen.

We’ve waited for generations for a chance to destroy the Liberal Democrats and get British politics back to its natural balance of a two party democracy. Finally, the Lib Dems have been exposed for the shallow bunch they are, and just at that moment when we can finally clean up, along comes this campaign, from within the party, seeking to bring about eternal coalition. (more…)

Facebook Twitter Digg Delicious StumbleUpon

The cat-flap coalition

02/01/2011, 07:00:21 PM

by Dan McCurry

Forged in the white heat of opportunism, the cat-flap coalition has ended the year with more resilience than we ever expected. Back in the summer, we talked about how long it would last. We underestimated the lure. We thought that Cameron had put out a saucer of milk, but it turned out to be goose liver pâté. And we seem to have lost our cat.

Hollywood screenwriters say that the first act ends when the protagonist passes the point-of-no-return. In this film, that happened when Dave held back the pâté as the reward for Nick committing to £9,000 tuition fees. Nick licked his lips and agreed. Now he is stuck in this movie, and, for him, there is no return.

Well before the election, Cameron told us that he planned to screw the students. But we did not listen. Each time that he accused the Labour party of creating a generation of debt, it seemed like just a rhetorical attack on Labour. Now we know that he meant that the young would pay for the deficit. It was not rhetoric. It was policy.

When we see the Tories bat away the students’ anger, towards the sandal wearers, we do not just see the stupidity of Clegg, but also the trickiness of Cameron. This is what we are up against. Tricky Dave is not to be underestimated. (more…)

Facebook Twitter Digg Delicious StumbleUpon

Andy Coulson is not J Edgar Hoover

12/12/2010, 09:36:23 AM

By Dan McCurry

J Edgar Hoover originally brought scandal upon himself when he worked in the private sector. However, he was saved from his disgrace when the US president offered him a job as his head of communications. As the holder of one of the most powerful civilian ranks in the US government, he answered directly to the president without the constraint of civil service accountability to stand in his way.

That paragraph is, of course, ridiculous. Why would anyone hire the disgraced J Edgar Hoover? Who in their right mind would be interested in a man whose view of the private lives of others was so contemptible that he bugged thousands of public figures? Not for national security reasons, but to pursue his own selfish ends.

Of all people, why would the US president hire J Edgar Hoover after he came to public notoriety following a bugging and deception scandal? A scandal that sent people around him to jail and over which he only narrowly avoided prosecution. It is inconceivable.

Yet that is exactly what David Cameron did when he hired Andy Coulson. There then followed a spate of bugging and burglary scandals involving the Tory party as beneficiaries. Questions were asked. The Guardian investigated. (more…)

Facebook Twitter Digg Delicious StumbleUpon