From: DAVIES, Geraint
Sent: 18 October 2010 11:36
Subject: PLP Committee – Geraint Davies MPDear Colleague,
As we move forward with our new Leadership team it’s important that the priorities and views of backbench members of the PLP are heard and reflected.
The Parliamentary Committee is being reformed and will act as a means of providing the Leadership with regular feedback from across the PLP and wider movement.
I am putting my name forward having represented a marginal London seat fighting the Tories and now a traditional seat in Wales challenged by the Liberal Democrats.
Therefore, I appreciate the range of local concerns amongst varying electorates we need to address to regain power. As a reincarnated MP, I am also keen to reflect the views of new MPs who bring fresh insights from the world outside Westminster whilst harnessing the talents of experienced members.
Your views and the issues in your constituency are a critical barometer to help Labour get back on track as we approach elections next year for our Welsh Assembly, Scottish Parliament and councils across England.
I am a Labour Co-operative and GMB supported MP with a background in industry so appreciate the need for us to carry the support of the wider movement and to bring confidence in our economic and industrial policy.
Our main resource is the skills, experience and energy of our PLP. If elected I would:
1 Listen to your views and concerns and be an approachable committee member accessible to all back-benchers
2. Be representative providing a drop in surgery and drop off/e mail feedback etc
3. Reflect varying opinion across all wings of the Party and the priorities of marginal and traditional seats
4. Be a strong & effective voice for back-bench opinion to the Leadership rooted in the breadth and depth of opinion across the PLP
5. Help ensure the committee acts as a critical friend.
6. Be accountable through regular report backs after meetings
7. Be active & visible in the Chamber and PLPThe Condems’ reckless and ideologically driven cuts programme alongside its gerrymandering agenda to gag the communities worst hit needs all our best efforts to bring Britain home to Labour.
The steady drumbeat of the Tory story that Labour left the cupboard bare has become more deep-rooted. That is why all of us in the PLP share a responsibility to set the record straight and regain the upper hand.
I hope you will support me with one of your votes and would be happy to discuss your views and priorities with you on xxxxxxxxxxx.
Yours truly,
Geraint Davies MP
INSIDE: PLP Parliamentary Committee “vote for me” – Geraint Davies
19/10/2010, 05:35:47 PMUNCUT: We must be honest so that we can be distinctive on the deficit, says Jonathan Todd
19/10/2010, 02:30:34 PMSOCIAL and economic debates on tax and spend run through the messages George Osborne will project tomorrow: his actions are fair (the social debate), best for the economy (the economic debate), and necessary, which intersects both debates. Clarity, and Labour’s cause, is aided by disentangling these strands.
Deficit reduction strategies need not only beginnings (start this year, next or when?), endings (completed in this parliament or next?), and content (tax and cuts mix?), but, crucially, they must also say what this content means for tax and spend in each year of this parliament. Political debate has so far failed carefully to pick over budgetary consequences from year to year.
There are opportunities for Labour in this examination. The government plans that cuts will account for three-quarters of the deficit reduction by 2014. However, next year, half the fiscal consolidation comes from tax rises. That spending cuts are intended to take greater strain over the longer-run has obscured the fact that 2011 sees ominous tax rises: increases in VAT and national-insurance. Read the rest of this entry »
UNCUT: Ed Miliband’s Israel problem, by Dan Hodges
19/10/2010, 09:00:28 AMEd Miliband has an Israel problem. Or, depending on your perspective, Israel has a problem with Ed Miliband.
The response to the foreign affairs section of his conference speech was dominated by Iraq. His brother’s angry reaction, which in truth reflected David’s personal antipathy towards Harriet, as much as his distaste for that particular passage, led the news bulletins. But it was the section on Israel that reverberated.
“The new generation must challenge old thinking”, he said. And duly hurled down the gauntlet. There needed to be international pressure on Israel over the ending of the moratorium on settlements. The attack on the Gaza flotilla was wrong. Israel must accept and recognize, in actions not just words, the Palestinian right to statehood. The Gaza blockage must be lifted. He would “strain every sinew to make that happen”. He would, of course, always defend Israel’s right to exist in peace and security. Read the rest of this entry »
UNBOUND: Tuesday News Review
19/10/2010, 07:31:06 AMThe economic alternative
Ever since George Osborne followed me into the Treasury he, and his Lib Dem colleagues, have been trumpeting the virtues of Draconian cuts in spending. They use the deficit as an excuse for excessive public sector cuts. There must be cuts but in the current climate any government’s priority should be growth, as I said and my colleague and successor Alan Johnson set out yesterday. The Labour government made growth and jobs a priority. We stopped the recession turning into a depression, and kept people in jobs and in homes. The Tories cite the example of Greece and the threat of downgrading from credit rating agencies to scare people. Parallels should not be drawn between the UK and Greek economies and they know it. The Coalition inherited a triple-A rated economy and in the months since Labour left office growth has risen faster than I predicted and borrowing is lower. The Government’s austerity plans threaten to derail recovery. – Alistair Darling, The Mirror
He did say that “Ed Miliband and I are clear” that halving the deficit over four years is the correct policy. “Our policy remains to halve the deficit by 2013, ’14”. But he immediately added that tax must “do more of the work” to balance the budget. He emphasised that “public services matter”, calling for an approach that “values public services” not one that “relishes curtailing them”. He said the approach must be flexible enough to react to changing circumstances — reminded his City audience of the Irish reversion into recession. And he highlighted the “biggest difference” between the Labour and Government positions as “the need to return to growth”, pointing out that “a rising dole queue means a bigger dole queue”. – The New Statesman
Accusing the Coalition of basing its timetable of cuts on the 2015 General Election rather than the economic needs of the country, Mr Johnson used his first speech in his new role to announce Labour would sting the banks for more money – an extra £3.5 billion on top of the UK Government’s already announced £2.4bn bank levy. “The banking sector is contributing £2.4bn whilst child benefit freezes and cuts will raise substantially more, so families take the strain while bankers grab the bonuses,” insisted Mr Johnson. “There’s no justification for such an unfair sharing of the burden, so we will ask the Government to think again and come forward with proposals for the banks to make a greater contribution.” While Labour would not increase personal taxation any further than planned, Mr Johnson said he accepted the Lib-Cons’ freezing of the basic rate limit for income tax from 2013. – The Herald
UNCUT: The Tories are handing defence to Jim Murphy, says John McTernan
18/10/2010, 04:00:08 PMThe first rule of spin club is that there’s no such thing as spin club. The
second rule of spin club is that there’s no such thing as spin. Why? Because
the members of spin club, if such a thing existed (which it doesn’t), know that spin never stays spun. It always unravels.
David Cameron and Liam Fox are going to find this out the hard way this
week. Presentationally, the run-up to the strategic defence and security review (SDSR) has been almost perfect. Liam Fox’s leaked letter set out the
prospect of cuts that would be so deep they would devastate our forces.
It also set up a villain – the treasury. With the scene set, the prime minister was able to ride to the rescue. And briefings over the weekend suggested that the defence budget had got a great deal – only an eight per cent cut. Read the rest of this entry »
UNCUT: The Labour right needs a new leader
18/10/2010, 12:30:37 PMby Siôn Simon
Many and dreadful have been the proclamations of its end, but New Labour is not dead. Uncut, as much as any, has mourned its passing. But to do so was an emotional spasm. Recollected in tranquility, there is hope beneath the hyperbole.
It is true that “New Labour”, whatever that meant, is no longer a dominant doctrine. It had been the ascendant national ideology since Blair became Labour leader in apposition (sic) to a philosophically bankrupt Conservative government in 1994. And it had been dominant within Labour since before it was invented. When Neil Kinnock became leader, in 1985 he opened a philosophical furrow which all his successors have ploughed since.
One of its currencies was linguistic nuance. And only in that coin can one understand the immense significance of Ed Miliband’s conference speech. According to the fragile, case-sensitive lexicon of New Labour, it was the brutal evisceration of a 25 year project. The keepers of the New Labour flame – those of us who have been fighting the fight since the Kinnock years – were devastated. Far more so than has been widely reported or understood. Read the rest of this entry »
GRASSROOTS: Conrad Landin blames Labour for the Browne report
18/10/2010, 11:30:20 AMReaction to the Browne report on higher education has focused on the broken promises of Liberal Democrats who pledged to vote against rises in tuition fees. For any opposition party, it is easy to fall into the trap of concentrating exclusively on the Lib Dems’ betrayal of their election pledges. Yes, this betrayal is the one, among many, that I still can’t get over – even more than their U-turn on the fundamental issue of the economy immediately after the election.
But the photos of Nick Clegg holding up his card pledging to vote against fee rises speak for themselves. While the media has devoted so much space to the betrayal that the morality of the rise in fees itself is put to one side. Which is exactly what David Cameron wants. Read the rest of this entry »
UNCUT: The Tories aren’t winners, so don’t let them write our history, says Michael Dugher
18/10/2010, 09:00:45 AMNixon once said that the moment the public begin to complain about the message is the moment that some of the public have heard the message. At 1230 on Wednesday, George Osborne will get to his feet at the dispatch box to announce the outcomes of the comprehensive spending review. Even if the precise measures contained in the review were only finalised late at night over recent days, his script was agreed months ago. With tedious repetition, Osborne will once again blame all of the country’s woes on the size of the deficit. He will say that Labour’s legacy, in terms of the public finances, was the product of reckless irresponsibility, “profligacy” and waste – and that the Tory-Lib Dem government is determined to “clean up the mess” Labour left behind. This, of course, is a complete untruth. But if Labour does not confront this argument, there is a danger that the message will not only be heard, but believed. Read the rest of this entry »
UNBOUND: Monday News Review
18/10/2010, 07:08:06 AMAJ to “push for growth”

Johnson pushing for growth
Alan Johnson, the new shadow chancellor, has suggested banks should pay an additional £3.5bn a year in taxes on top of the £2.5bn annual bank levy already introduced by the coalition. Mr Johnson will set out his thinking in a speech in the City on Monday, but has made it clear that he wants higher taxes to play a bigger part than public spending cuts in the deficit reduction. The shadow chancellor said the pace and scale of Mr Osborne’s planned £83bn spending cuts were “masochistic”. He argues that deficit reduction should go hand-in-hand with more infrastructure investment. Mr Johnson’s proposal to raid the banks to pay for this investment was questioned by the Tories after he appeared to suggest that a new bank tax would only proceed if there was international agreement. Labour officials later said that Mr Johnson regarded international consensus as desirable – but it was not a precondition. – The FT
Alan Johnson, the shadow Chancellor, has said that banks should take a more prominent share in plugging Britain’s budget deficit, as he attacked the Government for its “perverse” plan to bring public spending under control. Mr Johnson, who admitted he was “mildly surprised” when he was given the job by Ed Miliband, also revealed that Labour would consider increasing capital gains tax to help to avoid the brutal £83bn spending cuts being lined up by the Chancellor, George Osborne. In his first major interview in his new role, Mr Johnson conceded Labour would have to be “more specific” about its economic plans, but promised to set out further details on tax policy during a major speech today. “We think tax, on the banks in particular, should play a bigger role in this,” Mr Johnson told the BBC One’s The Andrew Marr Show. – The Independent
Shadow chancellor Alan Johnson is to accuse the Government of taking a “huge gamble with growth and jobs” as he sets out Labour’s alternative to the Treasury’s £83 billion cuts package. In his first major speech in his new role two days ahead of the comprehensive spending review, Mr Johnson is expected to reject Chancellor George Osborne’s argument that Britain’s structural deficit must be eliminated within four years, and insist: “There is another way.” The shadow chancellor is expected to unveil plans to make the banks contribute towards investment in infrastructure as part of a £7 billion “push for growth”. On Sunday Mr Johnson accused the coalition Government of “economic masochism”, warning that by cutting “too deeply and too quickly” it risks pushing Britain into an L-shaped recession in which the economy fails to recover momentum and “bumps along the bottom” for a period of years. Unless growth is supported, Britain could repeat Japan’s “lost decade” of economic stagnation, he suggested. – The Press Association
HOME: The week Uncut
17/10/2010, 04:04:00 PMGeorge and Liam have been fighting again. And it looks like the defence secretary is claiming victory on this one. Other departments are likely to be less lucky as the Chancellor sharpens his knife ready for the spending review on Wednesday.
But this week was all about Ed. He entered the chamber as the young pretender. The media waited for the slick PR machine that is the PM to swat him aside. Ed stood up, a little shaky at first, and then, very slowly but surely he started hitting him. And he didn’t stop.
Yes it was only his first PMQs, and there are plenty of rounds to go, but he did something very important. He gave the Labour benches something to really cheer – for the first time in a long time. Cameron now knows what he is going to face week in week out. The game has changed – the new boy knows the rules, and can play rough too.
In case you missed them, here are Uncut’s best read pieces of the last seven days:
Dan Hodges interviews Ed Miliband’s consigliere, Peter Hain
Tom Watson promises the new boss that he’ll stop behaving like a child
Siôn Simon gives his verdict on Ed’s first PMQs
Jessica Asato makes the case for the Oxbridge wonks
Pat McFadden offers a sensible review of the Browne report
Anthony Painter kicks off a debate on the role of the state
James Watkins says Labour mustn’t leave the countryside to the Tories








