Posts Tagged ‘Stella Creasy’

Exploitative credit: email your MP today

28/06/2011, 02:30:36 PM

by Stella Creasy

For some time now I’ve been challenging this government to take action on the cost of credit, highlighting the urgency of doing so as many families in Britain now find themselves turning to high cost credit lenders to make ends meet. We know the market is stacked against the consumer, and as it strengthens in Britain we are starting to see the consequences. This month R3 found that of the 46% of households that cannot cover their outgoings with their incomings, 10% are falling into debt directly as a result of repayments on high cost credit products.

This is no longer an issue solely affecting the poorest areas of Britain. Whether payday loans, hire purchase agreements or doorstep lending, the high interest rates and penalty charges these firms charge are hurting families in every constituency. These so called legal loan sharks are rapidly expanding their operations in the UK, taking advantage of the lack of regulation and growing demand for finance as the cost of living climbs and wages are frozen.

Ministers from both the treasury and the department for business, innovation and skills agree the way in which this market operates is a problem, but reject calls to introduce caps on the charges these companies can make. Instead they’re hoping the market will reconfigure itself through a growth in credit unions and increasing information on the costs involved to consumers. It would be easy to dismiss them out of hand as uncaring, blind to the plight of families caught in a cycle of debt to these companies.

(more…)

Facebook Twitter Digg Delicious StumbleUpon

The week Uncut

16/04/2011, 10:30:53 AM

In case you missed them, these were the best read pieces on Uncut in the last seven days:

Atul Hatwal presents the shadow cabinet goal of the month competition

Dan Hodges thinks blue Labour needs a spinner

Tom Watson says Rebekah Brooks should resign

Michael Dugher reports back from Leicester South

Stella Creasy says private debt is this government’s public injustice

Nick Keehan reports on Cameron’s immigration speech

Sunder Katwala says Nick Cohen is wrong on religion

Facebook Twitter Digg Delicious StumbleUpon

Private debt is this government’s public injustice

15/04/2011, 12:00:33 PM

by Stella Creasy

When David Cameron proclaimed failure to deal with the deficit would cost us all, he didn’t outline the true price of his austerity programme. Now with stubborn inflation, the VAT hike and pay freezes shrinking wage packets we can see consumers are the ones picking up the tab.

Whilst public debt is down by £43bn, private household debt is up by £245bn – five times as much. With the cuts planned in public spending the only way the government will see improvement in the office for budget responsibility’s forecasts for growth is if this ratio increases. The impact of this shift on the potential for economic recovery and the family fortunes of millions is substantial. And as people struggle to make ends meet, access to affordable credit – and its ugly sister, exorbitant debt – is fast becoming the new inequality in modern Britain.

The British have always had a different approach to personal debt than many other countries – we are a nation comfortable with borrowing in ways at which other cultures baulk. It is no surprise that we have the highest level of personal debt in any G7 country. This in itself isn’t a problem if it can be managed – much of the money owed is housing-related and reflects a culture in which mortgages are routine.

However for many, financial liabilities have recently taken a more worrying turn. Since the recession, nearly a third of Britons are spending more than they have coming in each month. Over four in ten people are now worried about their current level of debt, with four million fearing redundancy and four million having taken on more debt in recent months. 22% of consumers will carry a credit card debt throughout 2011 – with 7% saying they will still be paying for Christmas 2010 after June 2011.

The debts the public are getting into are not about luxuries but the everyday. Recent research shows more than two million people have used credit cards to pay their mortgage or rent, an increase of almost 50% in a year.

Access to money to pay for food and shelter is drying up for many – it is estimated five million people are now permanently overdrawn and eighteen million people have gone into the red at some point in the last twelve months. Nearly eight million of us failed to pay at least one bill over the last year. And it’s not just the poorest consumers in our society who are suffering. According to Experian, “suburban mindsets” – married, middle-aged consumer groups – represent the biggest rise in insolvencies in 2010. This compares to previous evidence that it was mainly an indication of disadvantaged groups.

All the signs point to the fact that pressures on consumers are going to get worse – and that the government is responsible. Credit Action says that of the forty five changes to the tax and benefit system made in the budget, twenty six will have a negative impact leaving households £200 worse off.

As Ed Balls has pointed out, cuts to childcare support will take over £1,500 a year from families alone. At the very time when consumer confidence is desperately needed to pump up withering high-streets, families are finding shopping too expensive and their purses empty.

Loading debt on to households helps the government cut the deficit at the pace they desire, but Labour must challenge them on the costs and consequences to all of doing so. And in an economy where jobs and growth are in short supply, debts like these don’t just mean lower consumer spending, higher levels of bankruptcy or repossessions. 29% of British parents admit they are arguing over their family’s finances, and a third of parents are suffering the stress of sleepless nights because they are worried about money.

There’s another danger lurking too. To cover costs, more and more are turning to sources of credit which may seem like short-term solutions but quickly become long-term problems. People who say they are likely to use an unauthorised overdraft this month has nearly doubled since July last year, from 900,000 to 1.6 million. So too, the payday lending industry in the UK with its 4,000% interest rates has quadrupled in the last 18 months.

Being able to borrow in a way which doesn’t leave a long-term scar on your family finances is the new dividing line within society. Those who can access mainstream credit may scrape by in austerity Britain. Those with little option but legal loan sharks, maxing out their credit cards or racking up unauthorised debts could spend a generation or more trying to become debt free.

Getting more people into paid work, reducing inflationary pressures and recognising the costs of living in the tax and benefits system could ease the difficulties many families are facing. So too would practical steps to improve the affordability of credit. Yet despite overwhelming support from a wide range of consumer bodies, campaign organisations and community groups, such proposals have so far been ignored by ministers.

This government wants to pretend personal debt is solely a private matter, but the social and economic consequences beg to differ. Lack of regulation in comparison to other countries allows the high-cost credit industry to go unchecked in the UK. Recognition of the problems caused by casino banking practices in the city is widespread – but this is only half the battle. We should not forget the financial needs of those in our communities too.

Credit should not be lent in a way that is detrimental to consumers without those that profit from exploiting them being made liable for the consequences. In the forthcoming finance bill I will table amendments to review whether corporation tax or the bankers’ levy could be applied in a way which would disincentivise this behaviour. Please ask your MP to co-sign these proposals. It’s time this government put the fortunes of every family first.

Stella Creasy is Labour and Co-Operative MP for Walthamstow.

Facebook Twitter Digg Delicious StumbleUpon

Who will be the next Labour leader?

09/03/2011, 02:05:27 PM

by Dan Hodges

One day the unthinkable will happen. We will be forced to stop all the clocks. Ed Miliband will cease to be Labour leader.

For those of us who have supported him loyally from the outset, it will be tough to come to terms with. But struggle on we will, because that is politics, and that is life.

Then our gaze will fall upon another. Were Ed to slip under the wheels of a passing automobile tomorrow, aside from hoping his brother possessed a cast iron alibi, the search for his replacement would be unlikely to extend beyond the same household. Ed Balls or Yvette Cooper would be a shoo-in. The contest would probably be decided around a kitchen table in Stoke Newington.

But throw things forward a few years. Let time march on. Who are the standard bearers of the next, new generation?

Over the last couple of months two names have begun to flutter around the tea rooms and stronger watering holes of Parliament. One has not exactly fluttered, but soared. Chuka Umunna, a political prospect so hot that bookmakers William Hill and Victor Chandler have (wrongly) installed him ahead of Ed Balls in the leadership sweepstakes. The second name is less heavily supported by the turf accountants, but is starting to attract increasing interest from those inside the Westminster beltway: Stella Creasy. (more…)

Facebook Twitter Digg Delicious StumbleUpon

Exploitatively high-cost lending has to stop

03/02/2011, 07:00:08 AM

by Sally Bercow

If you’re lucky enough to live in a Royal Palace, you’re not surrounded by “gold for cash” pawnbrokers. Neither do the door-to-door moneylenders that plagued my street in Tower Hamlets come to call. So I’m not going to go all faux woman of the people and pretend I rely on high cost credit. I don’t, haven’t (leaving aside the odd store card) and hopefully never will. But too many people in Britain do; millions of low income households depend on loan advances from pawnbrokers, payday lenders and doorstep lenders just to make ends meet.

These loans with sky-high interest rates come with devastating consequences, as borrowers are forced to cut back their spending on food, rent, utilities, fuel and other essentials in order to meet their loan repayments. The debt trap is blighting the lives of too many people, causing physical and mental health problems, damaging local communities and increasing the pressure on the public purse. In other words, high-cost credit affects everyone, whether you use it or not. (more…)

Facebook Twitter Digg Delicious StumbleUpon

The week Uncut

18/12/2010, 10:30:18 AM

In case you missed them, these were the best read pieces on Uncut in the last seven days:

Tom Watson offers a Christmas toast to the leader

Michael Dugher says replacing nanny with nudge is no joke

Dan Hodges interviews the shadow defence secretary, Jim Murphy

Stella Creasy says together we can make the government act on legal loan sharking

Peter Watt says that we don’t have the time to be rational

Kevin Meagher thinks Coronation Street is a Tory conspiracy

Tory local government leader lets slip contempt for the north

Facebook Twitter Digg Delicious StumbleUpon

Together we can make the government act over legal loan sharking

16/12/2010, 12:00:42 PM

by Stella Creasy

Campaigns thrive on names and numbers – the more of either, the greater the chance of interest and engagement. History may lionise the lone crusader, but it is only through convincing others to join in that causes actually succeed. If we are to win the arguments for progressive policies, Labour must be capable not only of speaking up for our ideals but building a critical mass of active champions for our actions in every community.

Yet in the competition for the airtime of advocates that now defines modern politics, slick single-issue groups often surpass complicated political messaging. We know many people share our progressive instincts – and that many also baulk at the confusion of institutions we have set up to express them. Even the hardiest Labour enthusiast struggles to set out with conviction the vital differences between the GC, EC, branch and LGC meetings. So to, when supporters make the effort to attend such forums we can let detail on policy close down rather than open up debate. Too often we start by proposing motions for others to be for or against rather than with open enquiry and deliberation to see if we can find mutual terms for collective action.

If we are confident in our passion for social justice, we should embrace and enjoy the process of seeking shared ambitions as well as recognising the value of compromise along the way. This principle is not just about being inclusive; it’s also about being effective. Common cause is the foundation block for asking people to help and ultimately common endeavour. That’s why in the fight to end legal loan sharking, as much effort has been made not just to have the right arguments about legislation, but also to reach out to any and all those who share our concerns. (more…)

Facebook Twitter Digg Delicious StumbleUpon

The government’s silence on legal loan sharking is putting families at risk

06/11/2010, 10:00:59 AM

by Stella Creasy

LAST WEEK  I wrote that loan sharks are circling Britain’s poorest families, excited by the likely effects of the Government’s spending review and lying in wait to prey on people’s increased financial vulnerability. This week, thanks to the hard work of campaigners and opposition MPs, the sharks are now starting to come under threat themselves.

My consumer credit (regulation and advice) bill, which seeks to combat exploitation in the payday and doorstep credit market, passed through its first reading this week. The bill pushes for a range of measures including a cap on the total cost of borrowing money, an expansion of credit union access points through the postal network and a levy to provide funding for debt counselling services to help those in financial difficulty.

It was supported through its first reading by a large number of Labour MPs who believe if the government is intent on pushing their budget on Britain, it will raise the number of families living with the daily misery of debt. We want them to take responsibility for the consequences of their policies– and judging by the growing public concern we are not the only ones.

According to the association of business recovery professionals, four in ten people are worried about their current level of debt, with three million fearing redundancy and two million having taken on more debt in recent months. (more…)

Facebook Twitter Digg Delicious StumbleUpon

The loan sharks are circling, and the government doesn’t care

30/10/2010, 10:30:25 AM

by Stella Creasy MP

Some facts are already depressingly familiar: the spending review will put half a million public sector workers out of a job; another half a million people in the private sector are expected to be fired as the economy slows.  Measures which support family incomes – whether tax credits, child benefit or the child trust fund and the savings gateway – are being stripped away. It is the perfect storm that occurs when liberal and conservative dogma are combined: a government imposing draconian cuts with one hand and taking away mechanisms to help people stay afloat with the other.

Here’s a consequence of the budget less widely publicised: the (loan) sharks are now circling Britain’s poorest families, watching them struggle financially and sensing a business opportunity. Indeed, the dishonestly named Peter Crook, chief executive of Provident, is delighted with the turn in events. It is no coincidence that following the comprehensive spending review his company’s share price rocketed by 5%. Provident offers short-term credit with a typical APR of 272% to those for whom banks and credit cards are out of reach – mainly women, the low paid and those with poor credit histories. It is a company that makes money by locking people into cycles of debt, interest on debt, late payment charges and interest on late payment charges. (more…)

Facebook Twitter Digg Delicious StumbleUpon

The Week Uncut

29/08/2010, 09:00:01 AM

The ballot papers are in the post. The final days to the leadership vote are marked by ‘fratricide’, suspected Tory tricks and the ever narrowing idea that it’s between two brothers. There’s also another race going on, and the fight for Labour’s mayoral candidacy is just as bitter.

At Uncut, Oona King ruined series one of The Wire, Andy Burnham’s desert island discs turned into a matter of geography, the leadership contenders got the top trumps treatment from our illustrator  and Chris Kelly…the puns were all too easy to come by.

In case you missed our week at Uncut,  here are our picks.

Milena Popova on the government’s misunderstanding and misuse of information

Labour Leadership Top Trumps

Andy Burnham’s desert island discs

Blair is flipping us the finger, but thats ok, says Dan Hodges.

The Oona King Interview

Stella Creasy talks social mobility

Facebook Twitter Digg Delicious StumbleUpon